Earlier this week the Daily Mail reported the story of an Israeli man who divorced his wife for refusing to part with her 550 cats. When push came to shove, she chose her feline companions over her husband.
Perhaps the final straw for the husband was not being able to sleep in his own bed due to the number of cats in the house. They also prevented him from accessing the bathroom and eating meals in the kitchen.
It is hardly surprising that the court's calls for a reconciliation fell on deaf ears.
We, as family lawyers, are often faced with arguments between divorcing couples regarding their pets, but it is more usual for disputes to centre around who gets the dog, rather than whether you choose your spouse or the dog!
This is a classic example of a spouse citing the other spouse's "unreasonable behaviour" - one of the facts upon which couples can obtain an immediate divorce. Apart from this and adultery, couples must otherwise wait two years to divorce by consent and, whilst there are proposals for this to change, there are no immediate plans for law reform.
For more advice on divorce follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter @Divorce_experts.
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Is marriage the "gold standard" ?
The Telegraph has today reported that a new survey which has been carried out by care home charity Friends of the Elderly shows that young people regard marriage and the raising of a family to be more worthwhile than a career or the acquisition of material wealth. The 'Marriage Foundation' which is an independent charity has been dedicated to championing marriage as the "gold standard for relationships".
However, the divorce rates still seem to be on the increase and therefore whilst young people may aspire to a happy and long marriage the Office of National Statistics suggest that the average length of a marriage in Britain is now 11.3 years. So divorce and trying to agree the care arrangements for children following marriage breakdown remains a fact a life for many. For more advice on divorce follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter.
However, the divorce rates still seem to be on the increase and therefore whilst young people may aspire to a happy and long marriage the Office of National Statistics suggest that the average length of a marriage in Britain is now 11.3 years. So divorce and trying to agree the care arrangements for children following marriage breakdown remains a fact a life for many. For more advice on divorce follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter.
Sunday, May 27, 2012
Divorce, Marriage, and the Presidents - Part 4 - Divorce
Divorce is a recognized handicap in politics. Until Ronald Regan was elected President in 1980 no candidate who had been divorced was elected President. Ironically, he also signed California’s first no fault divorce law while governor. The stigma of divorce is not what is once was. The first Presidential elections I remember is Eisenhower and Stevenson in 1952. The fact that Stevenson had been divorced made his nomination for president on the democratic ticket initially doubtful in 1952. Even though damage to Stevenson's political standing was lessened by the fact that he had not remarried, polls indicated that his divorced status would cost him votes. Stevenson had a problem because he was divorced but running against the very popular World War II hero did not help either. More recently, Republicans have nominated divorced men in Bob Dole and John McCain. In four of the last eight presidential elections, the Republicans have nominated a divorced man. Neither won. Neither Bob Dole or Ronald Reagan’s divorces were tied to infidelity. And John McCain’s first wife, Carol refused to speak out. It looks like Romney will be the Republican nominee. It would have been interesting to hear more what Gingrich first wife has had to say. The six leading contenders for the 2008 Republican Nomination (McCain, Romney, Huckabee, Paul, Thompson, and Giuliani had been married a total of ten times. John Kerry is the only recent Democratic nominee to be divorced and remarried. In 2008, Chris Dodd had done so, and Dennis Kucinick, for whatever it's worth, was on wife number three. In 2004 Kerry, Kucinich, and Lieberman were divorce. Lieberman may be the only candidate to ever get a “get” (Jewish divorce). Ted Kennedy ran against Carter in 1980. In early 1978, he and his wife, Joan, separated. The couple remained together announcing plans to divorce in 1981; the divorce was finalized in 1982. Franklin D. Roosevelt had an affair with Lucy Mercer and contemplated a divorce from Eleanor but whether true or not it was said that his mother would not let him get divorced because she felt that it would keep him from being President. This seems to be a common thread because it has also been said the Roosevelt was born at Campobello in Canada but his mother said it was in the United States for the same reason. Who cannot forget that divorce and remarriage to a divorcee toppled Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller from the position of front-runner for the 1964 Republican Presidential nomination.
It does not seem to be as much as a problem for first ladies. Rachel Jackson was divorce and will be the subject of a future blog. So was Florence “Flossie” King DeWolfe, a divorcee with one son, who married Warren Harding, five years her junior in 1891 and Elizabeth Ann Bloomer who divorced her first husband, William Warren, in 1947 and married Gerald Ford a year later.
As always, you can post any comment about this blog or Divorce Mediation, or just Mediation by following the directions at the right in the green column or at the bottom of this website. Learn more about mediation at http://www.center-divorce-mediation.com/ WM (252 5/27/12)
Friday, May 25, 2012
Your divorce: Are you an Eeyore or a Tigger?
I remember my first Pooh bear book when I was a kid. I loved it to death and pawed at the pages on a daily basis. I was so in love with the characters that when it came time to find ways to earn money for my school as a debutante, I even wrote and directed a play which starred almost my whole school when I was 16. Those were the days…
If you have never read A.A. Milne’s classic tales of a bear and friends – allow me to enlighten you.
Tigger
Tigger is the overly excitable, wildly bouncy tiger who is always bouncing around the enchanted forest. His attempts at spreading sheer joy to all those around him is infectious – even if he bowls everyone over like a bull in a china shop. He spread joy and gave energy to everyone. His most endearing quality (other than his cute listhp) was his knack of referring to himself in the 3rd person. Classic lines from tales of Pooh included:
- …because “bouncin’ that’s what Tiggers do!”)
- Woohoo hooo hooo hooo hooo!?
- TTFF – Ta ta For Now
- And then there was his little song:
The wonderful thing about Tiggers
Is Tiggers are wonderful things
Their tops are made out of rubber
Their bottoms are made out of springs
They're bouncy, trouncy, flouncy, pouncy
Fun, fun, fun, fun, FUN!
But the most wonderful thing about Tiggers
Is I'm the only one
Eeyore
Eeyore on the other hand is a somber donkey. Oh everything bad happens to this donkey as even his tail is held on by a button. Gloom and doom, and he is known for saying in the saddest tone “Thanks for noticin’ me”. His energy is vibrating pretty low and the outlook is bleak to status quo at best. He is the antithesis of personal empowerment. Eeyore has very little expectations from his friends and therefore wherever there is an occasion where his friends gather around his to help him, his thoughts of receiving the worst are dismissed and he has a feeling of being grateful to them. Eeyore’s biggest problem is when his tail falls off and that happens frequently (he has lost it many times).
Although always sad, he has very cute endearing qualities. So there is alot of compassion inside him. This is shown when Eeyore is able to grow a plant which Rabbit, a much respected gardener is unable to grow. Eeyore achieves this by giving the plant some of his love. His most famous quotes included:-
- Thanks for noticing me
- If it is a good morning
- It’s not much of a tail
- Most likely lose it again
- Days, weeks, months, who knows
- It works. Didn’t expect it to
The choice…
We all go through times in our lives when we become Eeyore. With anxiety we spend our time and energy fruitlessly by worrying about things we have no control over, things that are not real, etc… The thing to notice is that it’s kind of self-perpetuating. The more you believe nothing good will ever happen and it’s all gloom and doom – the more you will attract those things into your life. You need to switch your focus and be grateful. Grateful that there is nothing really wrong with you. Grateful for having another day on this earth. Grateful for all the people and things in your life.
Our thoughts are one of the few things truly within our control. Even if it is challenging to completely control what comes to mind, we can certainly learn to control the thoughts that stay in our minds, the thoughts we focus on, dwell on. Thoughts create world paradigms, impact our energies, and drive our actions. Even if you had a bit of Eeyore in you in the past, the past need not be the future and your tendency does not have to be your destiny. Even if a negative thing is true, does it serve you to focus on it? Even if a negative thing is true, odds are there are many positive things that also are true or could become true about a person or situation and your thoughts and energies may better serve you focused on the solution rather than the problem.
The key to becoming a Tigger
The principles of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy talk about Behavioural Actualisation – i.e. stop sitting around moping and get moving – take action and do stuff to pull yourself OUT of the abyss of gloom. Once you sink into the abyss of doom, it’s hard to get out.
As this youtube video from The NeverEnding Story, once you get stuck in the abyss, it could be deadly…
The Naked Divorce is a great programme for getting over a divorce and pulling yourself out of that doom and gloom.
- It has a structure with a defined beginning, middle and end
- You focus on the end goal
- You have a programme to follow and starting taking actions towards changing your behaviour today
- You have all the support you need
So, it’s up to you. No need to be an Eeyore in the situation you find yourself in. I will paraphrase a line from Morgan Freeman’s character Red in the Shawshank Redemption “Get busy healing, or get busy dying”
Till next time!
Lots of hugs
Thursday, May 24, 2012
Kim speaking at the Divorce Expo
Announcing a new exhibitor for TDE Chicago 2012:
Divorce Communications, based in Chicago.
Founders Kim Kick and Cathy Chestler have developed an online service, Divorce Communications that is the perfect tool for all shared parenting purposes, not just for families after divorce.
Make plans to attend TDE Chicago on August 18 and meet the visionaries behind this tool.
See the program, speakers, exhibitors and sponsors on the TDE website.
http://www.thedivorceexpo.com/
Divorce Communications, based in Chicago.
Founders Kim Kick and Cathy Chestler have developed an online service, Divorce Communications that is the perfect tool for all shared parenting purposes, not just for families after divorce.
Make plans to attend TDE Chicago on August 18 and meet the visionaries behind this tool.
See the program, speakers, exhibitors and sponsors on the TDE website.
http://www.thedivorceexpo.com/
To pre-nup or not to pre-nup
There has been speculation in the press this week as to whether the now fabulously wealthy Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his new bride have entered into a pre-nuptial agreement before their marriage. His press spokesman declined to comment.
In America this type of agreement, which sets out the terms of the financial settlement that will apply if the couple later divorce, is commonplace and is binding.
The position here is, for better or worse, rather different. A pre-nuptial agreement is not binding. The Courts still have the last word on money matters and in deciding what is fair following the end of a marriage or civil partnership . But things are changing as the Court will now accept that such agreements are strong evidence of what a couple intended should happen if they split up and they are likely to be upheld unless these is a good reason no to do so.
More couples who are already wealthy in their own right before marrying, perhaps for the second time, want to know where they will stand and how they can avoid arguments if they break up. It makes sense for them to consult a specialist Family Lawyer for advice in good time before the wedding and it doesn't mean that romance is dead!
For more advice on divorce follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter@Divorce_experts
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
‘Greyday loans’ on the Rise
A large number of grandparents are financially supporting their adult grandchildren according to a recent survey by MoneySypermarket.com. According to the results of the survey almost a quarter of grandparents and nearly one third of parents are still being relied upon by adult grandchildren and children to help ease the pressure of rising living costs, high unemployment, spiralling educational costs and debt.
Although families have always supported one another financially it appears that the current economic downturn and increased financial pressures mean that the younger generation is increasingly relying on that support to meet not only the day-to-day costs of living but also to help fund bigger-ticket items such as cars and first homes. Whilst that support can be incredibly helpful, or in some cases absolutely necessary, how should so called ‘greyday loans’ from parents and grandparents be treated on divorce?
When the court looks at a potential financial settlement the starting point is to consider all the assets. This will include any items purchased using loans from family members. If however the parties ‘needs’ can be met without resorting to those assets it may be possible to exclude them from the division. This is though a potentially complex area of law and you should seek legal advice from an expert family lawyer.
Loans to assist with day-to-day expenses can be treated as a debt to be repaid in the same way that a bank loan or credit card liability would have to be taken into account. There is however no guarantee of this and much will depend on individual circumstances, including whether or not there was a formal loan agreement. In the absence of such evidence your ex-spouse may argue that the money is a ‘soft loan’ which does not need to be repaid in the same way as say a bank loan, or may even argue that the money is in fact an outright gift and will never be repaid. Again, divorce advice from a family lawyer should be sought.
For more advice on divorce follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter @divorce_experts.
Although families have always supported one another financially it appears that the current economic downturn and increased financial pressures mean that the younger generation is increasingly relying on that support to meet not only the day-to-day costs of living but also to help fund bigger-ticket items such as cars and first homes. Whilst that support can be incredibly helpful, or in some cases absolutely necessary, how should so called ‘greyday loans’ from parents and grandparents be treated on divorce?
When the court looks at a potential financial settlement the starting point is to consider all the assets. This will include any items purchased using loans from family members. If however the parties ‘needs’ can be met without resorting to those assets it may be possible to exclude them from the division. This is though a potentially complex area of law and you should seek legal advice from an expert family lawyer.
Loans to assist with day-to-day expenses can be treated as a debt to be repaid in the same way that a bank loan or credit card liability would have to be taken into account. There is however no guarantee of this and much will depend on individual circumstances, including whether or not there was a formal loan agreement. In the absence of such evidence your ex-spouse may argue that the money is a ‘soft loan’ which does not need to be repaid in the same way as say a bank loan, or may even argue that the money is in fact an outright gift and will never be repaid. Again, divorce advice from a family lawyer should be sought.
For more advice on divorce follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter @divorce_experts.
Sunday, May 20, 2012
Divorce, Marriage, and the Presidents Part 3 – Warren G. Harding
I have always been fascinated with Warren Harding. As I type an autographed letter and picture are looking down on me. “The Shadow of Blooming Grove” by Francis Russell was one of the first presidential biographies I collected and is one of 300 I own. I have updated it from the Book of the Month Club edition and even a different copy published in England. We also visited his home in Marion, Ohio, visited Teapot Dome in Wyoming and picked up an oily rock from there. I also like the fact the Franklin D. Roosevelt ran on the opposing ticket as the Vice Presidential candidate for James Cox in 1920.
Harding is well known for his extramarital affairs. Internet research shows that allegedly, for 15 years Harding saw Carrie Phillips, wife of Harding’s friend James Phillips. After he won the Republican presidential nomination, the Republican National Committee attempted to silence Phillips with an all-expense paid trip to Japan, a $20,000 payment as well as a promise of future monthly stipends. But is the story of Nan Britton which captures the imagination. I have her book called the President’s Daughter. My mother told me when she was a child (she was born in 1919) the book was considered a very racy book. Britton was recently depicted on the HBO series, Boardwalk Empire. She was a teenager in Ohio she developed a crush on Harding. In 1919, the year before Harding’s run for President, Britton gave birth to a baby girl. She said it was Harding’s.
With the help of secret service agents, Nan sneaked into the White House, and she and the President would walk down a hidden hallway, which Nan called it “our secret passage”—connecting the oval office and a coat closet. Inside the 5-by-5-foot closet, they would make love.
In 1923, with scandals breaking out all around him, the President fled Washington for a tour of the west and Alaska. On the return trip he became ill, and on august 2, he died in his San Francisco hotel room. He was 58.
The cause of death was reported as a stroke, but Harding had suffered food poisoning earlier in the trip. Later an agent for the Bureau of Investigation published a report claiming that Florence had poisoned the President. But no one could ever prove it. Mrs. Harding had refused to have an autopsy done on her husband. Was this her way of divorcing him?
As always, you can post any comment about this blog or Divorce Mediation, or just Mediation by following the directions at the right in the green column or at the bottom of this website. Learn more about mediation at http://www.center-divorce-mediation.com/ WM (251) 5/20/12
Friday, May 18, 2012
Bankruptcy Attorneys Boise Idaho (208) 472-2383
Disclosing Debt and Assets in Bankruptcy
As a Boise Bankruptcy Attorney, one of the things I hear most frequently from people is whether they have to disclose all their debt and their assets for a bankruptcy and what happens if they don't. If you fail to disclose your assets will be committing fraud and can be fined up to $5,000 and can be given up to a 5 year jail sentence or both.
Why would someone conceal information from the Bankruptcy Court? If you have assets that exceed your exemptions, those are used to pay off your debt to secured creditors. If you don't tell the Bankruptcy trustee how much property you actually have, your intent would have to be to keep that property for yourself and not use it to pay your just debts. In a bankruptcy you have to swear that you are disclosing all the required information and if you fail to you have committed fraud against the court. Likewise, some people might not want to inform the Bankruptcy Court about certain debt they have. As a bankruptcy lawyer I usually see this most often when they want to have credit available to them. As you know, when you file Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 your credit will need some time to be repaired. You need to disclose all your debt. You can, however, approach the creditor and ask if they will allow you to keep the line of credit open. It can happen, but is unusual.
Can I File for Bankruptcy?
If you are having financial difficulty this is a question you may have asked yourself or a bankruptcy attorney. If you are in financial straights you can look into the possibility of filing for bankruptcy. There are a few things that you cannot do, however. You may not use bankruptcy to stall paying your debt, to delay, to obstruct, to harass or for any other improper purpose. You also cannot, within 60 days of filing, incur a luxury purchase in the amount of $1.075 or more. You also cannot receive an aggregate of cash advance in the same or greater amount. If you do, that debt presumably will not be discharged.
Are There Alternatives to Bankruptcy
Yes. Part of the new bankruptcy law is to require that those considering bankruptcy take two credit counseling courses. The first course, which must be completed before your application is accepted, is aimed, in part, at helping people understand that they can negotiate with their creditors. It is possible to develop your own repayment plan with creditors without taking the additional step of bankruptcy. However, if you are seeking a discharge, it is unlikely that a creditor will discharge your debt completely.
If you are considering bankruptcy and need to speak to an attorney, give us a call, (208) 472-2383 and one of the lawyers in our office will help you understand bankruptcy and help you decide if it is right for you.
As a Boise Bankruptcy Attorney, one of the things I hear most frequently from people is whether they have to disclose all their debt and their assets for a bankruptcy and what happens if they don't. If you fail to disclose your assets will be committing fraud and can be fined up to $5,000 and can be given up to a 5 year jail sentence or both.
Why would someone conceal information from the Bankruptcy Court? If you have assets that exceed your exemptions, those are used to pay off your debt to secured creditors. If you don't tell the Bankruptcy trustee how much property you actually have, your intent would have to be to keep that property for yourself and not use it to pay your just debts. In a bankruptcy you have to swear that you are disclosing all the required information and if you fail to you have committed fraud against the court. Likewise, some people might not want to inform the Bankruptcy Court about certain debt they have. As a bankruptcy lawyer I usually see this most often when they want to have credit available to them. As you know, when you file Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 your credit will need some time to be repaired. You need to disclose all your debt. You can, however, approach the creditor and ask if they will allow you to keep the line of credit open. It can happen, but is unusual.
Can I File for Bankruptcy?
If you are having financial difficulty this is a question you may have asked yourself or a bankruptcy attorney. If you are in financial straights you can look into the possibility of filing for bankruptcy. There are a few things that you cannot do, however. You may not use bankruptcy to stall paying your debt, to delay, to obstruct, to harass or for any other improper purpose. You also cannot, within 60 days of filing, incur a luxury purchase in the amount of $1.075 or more. You also cannot receive an aggregate of cash advance in the same or greater amount. If you do, that debt presumably will not be discharged.
Are There Alternatives to Bankruptcy
Yes. Part of the new bankruptcy law is to require that those considering bankruptcy take two credit counseling courses. The first course, which must be completed before your application is accepted, is aimed, in part, at helping people understand that they can negotiate with their creditors. It is possible to develop your own repayment plan with creditors without taking the additional step of bankruptcy. However, if you are seeking a discharge, it is unlikely that a creditor will discharge your debt completely.
If you are considering bankruptcy and need to speak to an attorney, give us a call, (208) 472-2383 and one of the lawyers in our office will help you understand bankruptcy and help you decide if it is right for you.
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Untying the Knot, and Bonds, of Marriage By ABBY ELLIN Published: April 27, 2012, New York Times
WHEN the performance artist Marina Abramovic separated from her longtime partner, Ulay, in 1988, they decided to honor the occasion with a ritual. She traveled to one end of the Great Wall of China, he to the other, and after a 90-day hike, they met in the middle, embraced and officially parted ways.
It was a very tangible, and symbolic, way for them to signal the end of their 12-year relationship. The event also became a movie, “The Lovers: The Great Wall Walk.” As Ms. Abramovic later said in an interview, “It was a very dramatic and very painful ending.”
While not every separating and divorcing couple has the time, energy or desire to trek 2,000 miles just to signify the demise of their relationship, more couples are choosing to bless the occasion with some kind of ceremony. These are not, mind you, margarita-infused galas with shredded wedding dresses and Gloria Gaynor’s “I Will Survive” throbbing in the ether. Instead, these ceremonies are often deeply personal and spiritual, intended to help the split couple and their families move past disappointment, anger and hurt.
“When people get married, they have a wedding ceremony, they’re making vows and promising to be with each other,” said Barbara Biziou, a wedding officiant in Manhattan and the author of the book “Joy of Ritual.” “When that dissolves, you need another ceremony to release you from it.”
She knows of what she speaks: 15 years after her divorce, on a trip to Paris, she tossed her wedding band into the Seine.
“It was pretty eye-opening,” said Ms. Biziou, who is an ordained Sanctuary of the Beloved minister. “You know how sometimes you feel like someone punched you in the stomach? All of a sudden that feeling was gone. I felt lighter, more open to meeting men and being in relationships after, and I felt a sense of peace that I hadn’t felt before.”
Experts say that these types of rituals are necessary, especially since they are lacking in much of our culture. Some religions have built divorce ceremonies into their liturgy. (Judaism has a get, a Jewish divorce officiated by a rabbi; the Unitarian Universalist Church has a ceremony of hope, and the United Methodist Church offers a divorce ceremony, but not much else commemorates the ending of a relationship.)
“A marriage begins with ritual and ceremony, and it should end that way,” said Risa Marlen, a marriage and family therapist in Teaneck, N.J., who has conducted divorce ceremonies. “The human psyche needs that closure. It warrants it. It deserves it.”
According to 2010 data from the Pew Research Center, 14 percent of all American adults (18 and older) are currently divorced or separated, compared with 11 percent in 1990. In 1980, it was 9 percent; in 1970, 6 percent.
Divorce ceremonies run the gamut, be it elaborate affairs witnessed by friends and family or vows spoken by the former couple (or half of the former couple) and, sometimes, their children. And though they vary in scope, the incense and patchouli factor can be high. While they aren’t legally binding, they offer a more palatable alternative to court hearings, bitterness and exorbitant lawyer fees. (The ceremonies are typically $350 to $750.)
When Jean Ando, 71, a retired reference librarian in Manhattan, and her husband divorced after 40 years of marriage, they held a simple ceremony in a labyrinth near the apartment they once shared. They each walked into the center, shared memories of their life together and wished each other well.
“I think we hugged, and maybe ended with a handshake,” Ms. Ando recalled. “We then walked out separately to symbolize our moving on in separate paths. We’d had a fairly simple wedding ceremony, and it was sort of nice to end it with a simple divorce ceremony.”
Charlotte Eulette, on the other hand, went all out for hers. Ms. Eulette, the director of the Celebrant Foundation and Institute in Montclair, N.J. — from which Ms. Marlen also received credentials as a life-cycle celebrant to conduct all sorts of ceremonies signaling life’s various passages. About seven years ago, she realized that she was still grieving the end of her 11-year marriage and that it was preventing her from moving on. So she decided to host a divorce ceremony for herself.
“My divorce took a lot out of me, and I wanted to be able to realize that this is not something I’m embarrassed about, it’s something I’ve been through in my life and I will also hold sacred the time I spent in this marriage,” she said.
She invited about 80 people to a nightclub and handed them each candles. She wore a shimmery cocktail dress and marched into the room to the sound of beating drums. As Ms. Eulette reclaimed her maiden name, her mother slipped a ring onto her daughter’s wedding finger. “She said, ‘This is the love that your family has for you, and it has no beginning or end,’ ” Ms. Eulette recalled. There were laughter, tears, applause, music and dancing.
Sharon Shores, 58, a social media business-marketing consultant in Denver, was married for 10 years and divorced in April 2011. Ms. Shores asked her ex-husband if he would join her in a “dissolving ceremony” that would verbally, emotionally and ceremonially terminate their marriage bond.
In October, the former couple stood before a roaring fire at a lodge in Lakewood, Colo., with views of the Red Rocks Amphitheater and the Continental Divide. Nick Meima, an officiant from the Celebrant Foundation who led the event, had sent out a questionnaire in advance, asking the couple to describe what they were letting go of and what they would miss about each other. At the ceremony, he handed them a rope made of two different colored strands. The couple took turns expressing what they were leaving behind while cutting the cord. “When it was all over, they each had half of the rope,” Mr. Meima said. “And then I extended it, and I said, ‘Now you are literally at loose ends, and it’s up to you to choose how to weave these things together in your new life.’ ”
Ms. Shores said, “The ceremony provided a way to acknowledge the good things we had together, and provided a continued path for forgiveness and moving on.,” She added: “Emotionally, it was more draining than I thought it would be. At the same time, it was very releasing.”
While divorce ceremonies are important to the participants (or, at least, one of them), they can be especially necessary for the children of divorcing couples.
Not long ago Kevin Bain, a retired high school teacher and life-cycle celebrant in New York, led a ceremony for a couple who had been together for seven years and had one child. “They told me the loveliest story of how they met, how they got married and how they came to terms that it wasn’t right,” Mr. Bain said. About 25 friends and both sets of parents showed up to a restaurant in Midtown Manhattan. “It was like a small wedding, but it was a divorce,” he said. “They were not upset or bitter, but they wanted to each feel that when they went their own way to feel free and released. It ended with them taking vows to always remain close friends and that the child would be their priority for the rest of their lives.”
Stephanie Dedovitch, 27, of Milford, Pa., was 10 when her parents split up. She wishes there had been some kind of ceremony for her and her sister. “I felt torn in half, and I didn’t understand what had happened, but also why my mother was acting the way she was acting,” said Ms. Dedovitch, whose mother, Teresa Dedovitch, a Universal Life Church minister, conducts divorce and other ceremonies today.
“I felt it was my fault. I really wish there was something like that. For younger kids it’s more a marker in their life, and for older kids, I think they can better understand the words that are being spoken. I think both my sister and I would have benefited from having closure.”
Dr. Lawrence Birnbach, a psychoanalyst and an author of “How to Know If It’s Time to Go,” believes these ceremonies are necessary for people to move on. “Divorce is a new passage, an entrance into a new life,” he said. “In many religions a funeral is not a funeral, it’s a memorial, and the person is going on to something better.”
After a couple of years, he added, most people who divorce realize that “it’s not the end of a life or one’s happiness, it’s a beginning as well.”
What do you think about having a divorce ritual? Weigh in now.
Marriage has never been so popular!
A recent survey by an on line casino revealed results that showed marriage is certainly not outdated and still remained a tradition that most wish to sign up to.
The survey revealed that 85% of their single male members intended to marry during their lives and 61% were prepared to describe themselves as "keen" to marry.
The results of the survey also indicated that the ideal age to commit to marriage is between 30 and 34 years old. Furthermore, 92% of the men undertaking the survey confirmed that marriage is a life long commitment.
It is certainly an interesting survey as it's results suggest that marriage is a common aim for most men in society (well, those men who undertook the on line casino survey). As a divorce lawyer, it is very refreshing to hear about results that ultimately promote the concept of marriage in how it is viewed in society. However, as marriage is hopefully a life long commitment it should not be entered into lightly and it may be wise to take advice from a specialist family law solicitor with particular regard to pre nuptial agreements before tying the knot.
For more advice on family matters follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter @Divorce_experts
The survey revealed that 85% of their single male members intended to marry during their lives and 61% were prepared to describe themselves as "keen" to marry.
The results of the survey also indicated that the ideal age to commit to marriage is between 30 and 34 years old. Furthermore, 92% of the men undertaking the survey confirmed that marriage is a life long commitment.
It is certainly an interesting survey as it's results suggest that marriage is a common aim for most men in society (well, those men who undertook the on line casino survey). As a divorce lawyer, it is very refreshing to hear about results that ultimately promote the concept of marriage in how it is viewed in society. However, as marriage is hopefully a life long commitment it should not be entered into lightly and it may be wise to take advice from a specialist family law solicitor with particular regard to pre nuptial agreements before tying the knot.
For more advice on family matters follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter @Divorce_experts
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
How to stop getting hooked by your ex!!
Learn all about
- Establishing some ground rules… (it’s all ABOUT Buckets and Spoons )
- Allow them to vent – YES, actually LET them lose it whilst you file your nails (in your mind)
- Channel a powerful person (time for Queen Latifah to come out)
- Get a scripted answer to your issue – ASK A QUESTION 24/7
- Master communication skills and learn boundaries in the Naked Divorce 21-day programme
Till next time!
Hugs
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Battle of the Sexes Now Won By Women On Divorce - But Is It What They Want?
It is reported in the press today that the actress, Mena Suvari is divorcing her husband of less than two years and he is seeking monthly spousal maintenance payments of $17,000. Mena is reported to earn in the region of $750,000 each year.
Divorce law is not sexist. If the wife earns significantly more than the husband, the husband may be entitled to spousal maintenance from her as part of his divorce settlement. Given the significant increase in the number of "bread winning" wives, those that have high power jobs which pay significantly more than their husband's jobs, this scenario is becoming increasingly common. Women have been fighting for equality for years, but many are not happy when this equality makes them the paying party when they divorce.
These "bread winning" wives need to consider taking the advice of a family law solicitor before they marry and entering into a pre-nuptial agreement, if they want to try to protect their wealth if their marriage fails.
For more advice on divorce follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter@Divorce_experts.
Divorce law is not sexist. If the wife earns significantly more than the husband, the husband may be entitled to spousal maintenance from her as part of his divorce settlement. Given the significant increase in the number of "bread winning" wives, those that have high power jobs which pay significantly more than their husband's jobs, this scenario is becoming increasingly common. Women have been fighting for equality for years, but many are not happy when this equality makes them the paying party when they divorce.
These "bread winning" wives need to consider taking the advice of a family law solicitor before they marry and entering into a pre-nuptial agreement, if they want to try to protect their wealth if their marriage fails.
For more advice on divorce follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter@Divorce_experts.
Sunday, May 13, 2012
Divorce, Marriage, and the Presidents, Part 2 - Grover Cleveland
Sorry I have not blogged for awhile. I must be in the mood but this is my 250th blog! Why do so many Presidents adjust their names? It was actual Stephen Grover Cleveland, Hiram Ulysses Grant,Thomas Woodrow Wilson, John Calvin Coolidge, Jr., Gerald Ford was Leslie Lynch King, Jr., Bill Clinton was William Jefferson Blythe III and maybe Willard Mitt Romney. But I am digressing from my continuation of discussion of Divorce, Marriage, and the Presidents. Cleveland had John Edward’s scandal and survived it.
To counter Cleveland's image of superior morality while running for President against James Blaine who was allegedly corrupt, Republicans discovered reports that Cleveland had fathered an illegitimate child while he was a lawyer in Buffalo, and chanted "Ma, Ma, where's my Pa? (Following the Cleveland’s electoral victory, the "Ma, Ma ..." attack phrase gained a classic rejoinder: "Gone to the White House. Ha! Ha! Ha!") When confronted with the emerging scandal, Cleveland's instructions to his campaign staff were: "Tell the truth." Cleveland admitted to paying child support in 1874 to Maria Crofts Halpin, the woman who claimed he fathered her child named Oscar Folsom Cleveland. Halpin was involved with several men at the time, including Cleveland's friend and law partner, Oscar Folsom, for whom the child was also named. Cleveland did not know which man was the father, and is believed to have assumed responsibility because he was the only bachelor among them.
But it does not stop there. Cleveland entered the White House as a bachelor. His sister, Rose Cleveand, moved into the White House and acted as hostess for the first two years of his administration. In 1885 the daughter of Cleveland's friend Oscar Folsom visited him in Washington. Frances Folsom was a student at Wells College; when she returned to school, President Cleveland received her mother's permission to correspond with her. They were soon engaged to be married.
But it does not stop there. Cleveland entered the White House as a bachelor. His sister, Rose Cleveand, moved into the White House and acted as hostess for the first two years of his administration. In 1885 the daughter of Cleveland's friend Oscar Folsom visited him in Washington. Frances Folsom was a student at Wells College; when she returned to school, President Cleveland received her mother's permission to correspond with her. They were soon engaged to be married.
On June 2, 1886, Cleveland married Frances Folsom in the Blue Room at the White House. He was the second president to marry while in office (Tyler was the first), and the only president to have a wedding in the White House. This marriage was unusual because Cleveland was the executor of Oscar Folsom's estate and had supervised Frances' upbringing after her father's death, but the public did not take exception to the match. At twenty-one years old, Frances Folsom Cleveland remains the youngest First Lady, and the public soon warmed to her beauty and warm personality. The Clevelands had five children: Ruth (1891–1904)(Baby Ruth candy bar was named after her and not Babe Ruth); Ester (1893–1980); Marion (1895–1977); Richard Folsom (1897–1974); and Francis Grover (1903–1995).
As always, you can post any comment about this blog or Divorce Mediation, or just Mediation by following the directions at the right in the green column or at the bottom of this website. Learn more about mediation at http://www.center-divorce-mediation.com/ WM (250) 5/13/12
Thursday, May 10, 2012
The Naked Truth About Divorce
The Telegraph today reports of Michelle Mone's heartbreak following the collapse of her marriage to husband, Michael.
Mr Mone - the father of the couple's three children - reportedly left his wife for one of her employees, although he has said that it was Ms Mone's decision to feature in an underwear shoot which led to the breakdown of the marriage.
There are, of course, only two people who know the real reasons for the marriage breakdown. How does this relate to divorce? Aside from adultery and waiting for a minimum of two years to divorce by consent, the only basis which could be used in support of a divorce petition is the other person's "unreasonable behaviour." This is entirely subjective and can range from, for example, a husband's dissatisfaction with his wife's career choices, to serious incidents of domestic violence.
It is important for separating couples to realise that in the majority of cases the basis of a divorce has no bearing on any other proceedings - whether that be arrangements for children or the financial settlement. It is purely a means to an end.
For more advice on divorce follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter @Divorce_experts.
Mr Mone - the father of the couple's three children - reportedly left his wife for one of her employees, although he has said that it was Ms Mone's decision to feature in an underwear shoot which led to the breakdown of the marriage.
There are, of course, only two people who know the real reasons for the marriage breakdown. How does this relate to divorce? Aside from adultery and waiting for a minimum of two years to divorce by consent, the only basis which could be used in support of a divorce petition is the other person's "unreasonable behaviour." This is entirely subjective and can range from, for example, a husband's dissatisfaction with his wife's career choices, to serious incidents of domestic violence.
It is important for separating couples to realise that in the majority of cases the basis of a divorce has no bearing on any other proceedings - whether that be arrangements for children or the financial settlement. It is purely a means to an end.
For more advice on divorce follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter @Divorce_experts.
Wednesday, May 09, 2012
Financial ties hard to break
Today's Metro features an article on an increasingly common theme - the influence of financial matters on people's decisions about relationships.
According to the article, Shelter has found that 235,000 people in London alone moved in with a partner for "mainly" financial reasons in the last 3 years, and that a further 128,000 had to remain living together after they split up because they couldn't afford to live apart.
The survey confirms our experience. Dealing with the practicalities of separating into 2 households after splitting up is often the most difficult issue a couple have to address.
Few people know their legal rights or obligations before they move in together . There are a lot of myths about what protection the law does and does not offer to people, whether married or living together, and whether or not they have children . Many people do not think of the potential implications before they start living together.
Whilst no-one likes to contemplate a relationship coming to end, it is advisable to know from the start where you stand . If the worst then happens unnecessary complications and disagreements could be avoided . A good Family Lawyer will be able to advise as to the legal and practical consequences of a separation in any given set of circumstances, which can help a couple decide how to plan and manage their financial affairs once they are living together.
For more advice on family matters follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter @Divorce_experts
According to the article, Shelter has found that 235,000 people in London alone moved in with a partner for "mainly" financial reasons in the last 3 years, and that a further 128,000 had to remain living together after they split up because they couldn't afford to live apart.
The survey confirms our experience. Dealing with the practicalities of separating into 2 households after splitting up is often the most difficult issue a couple have to address.
Few people know their legal rights or obligations before they move in together . There are a lot of myths about what protection the law does and does not offer to people, whether married or living together, and whether or not they have children . Many people do not think of the potential implications before they start living together.
Whilst no-one likes to contemplate a relationship coming to end, it is advisable to know from the start where you stand . If the worst then happens unnecessary complications and disagreements could be avoided . A good Family Lawyer will be able to advise as to the legal and practical consequences of a separation in any given set of circumstances, which can help a couple decide how to plan and manage their financial affairs once they are living together.
For more advice on family matters follow our family law blog or follow us on Twitter @Divorce_experts
Monday, May 07, 2012
Rule of the Role
We all play a variety of roles throughout our lifetime. All of us had a specific role in our family-of-origin. For some of us the role may have been the “savior”, jumping into difficult situations and protecting family members from perceived harm. Others may have taken on the role of “peace maker”, sorting out conflict and restoring order to the family unit. Still others may have been in the role of the “mess up”. This individual is the one who acts out the disturbance going on in the home resulting in him getting into trouble, the one who family members expect nothing good to come from.
Our roles change throughout our lifetime as do our relationships with others. It can be challenging to get family members to recognize how an individual has changed. Many adults return to extended family functions and leave feeling misunderstood, pigeon-holed, and thrust back into childhood roles that no longer exist for her. Family members react to each other out of entrenched patterns of communication, they may not even recognize the role that they place other members in, or their own role. Communication may break down when one or more family members do not play their part as expected.
It can be difficult for individuals to recognize the role they play in relation to family members as well as the role they expect family members to play. Our communication with others is strongly influenced by our perceived role in relation to the individual (or individuals) we are interacting with. For example, if we view ourself in the role of a subordinate and the other as being in a role of authority and power (employee to employer) we communicate differently than if the roles were reversed.
This same dynamic exists within our immediate and extended family. We may fall back into dysfunctional, non-existent family roles that once served a purpose. These same roles may now serve only to shut down communication and contribute to hurt feelings. A parent may continue to treat an adult child who has become self-sufficient and successful as the mess up. This can result in the parent never truly seeing the person his child has grown into and the child continuing to feel inadequate, powerless, and not good enough in the eye of her parent.
Trying to get family members to recognize that you are not the same person as you were in your youth is not always easy. Some family members will become upset and agitated when the family dynamics are thrown into disarray when one member doesn’t fulfill his role as expected. Other family members may discount any behavior or action the individual takes that does not fit into her past role in the family. Still others will continue interacting with family members in their past roles, staunchly refusing to change their attitude, communication style, or position. Maintaining healthy boundaries can help alleviate some of the tension that arises in this situation. It is acceptable to politely, yet firmly, assert yourself and not fall back into old, dysfunctional roles within your family.
The problem with static family roles is that they serve as barriers to developing closeness and healthy communication. Looking beyond the traditional roles we had in our family will help develop a more genuine relationship between family members. Ask yourself what role you had in your family growing up. How did it evolve and change over the years? Are you thrust back into that role when you are around family now? What role do you place your family members in? Are you able to maintain appropriate boundaries with family members?
Copyright © 2012 Divorce Communications. All Rights Reserved.
Divorced Parents and Summer Time
Divorced Parents and Summer Time Divorce impacts a child’s life in every way. Summers can be extremely challenging because children are home from school and they have a lot of free time. I have written up some key points to keep in mind when scheduling your children’s summer activities.
• Co--Parenting Plan. When planning for the summer, refer to the co-parenting plan that was created when you divorced. This will help guide you as you plan summer activities.
• Use a Shared Calendar. When creating events and summer activities use a shared calendar to list dates and times for the children’s events. Be specific and be sure to add details such as exact dates and times and who is picking up. Be sure to write down everything, dentist appointments, visitation schedules, special events, etc...
• Communication. Whether it is a vacation, visitation, summer school, or a week at grandmas house, communicate. Make sure not only you and the co-parent know what’s going on but your children do as well. Involve them to the degree that allows them to have some input in how they would like to spend their summer. This does NOT mean you put them in the middle when you and your co-parent are planning. As the children do get older they will be having more to say about their summers and it is important to allow them to feel they have a say.
• Do NOT put the children in the middle. Summer should be a nice time for everyone, especially the children. Let your children BE children and do not play tug of war with them. Never make them choose between which parent they want to be with, that is an ADULT decision.
I suggest using our calendar at www.DivorceCommunications.com. Our calendar allows parents to create events at the same time allowing their children access to view them. This way everyone involved will be able to access the main calendar.
Cathy-
Copyright © 2012 Divorce Communications. All Rights Reserved.
• Co--Parenting Plan. When planning for the summer, refer to the co-parenting plan that was created when you divorced. This will help guide you as you plan summer activities.
• Use a Shared Calendar. When creating events and summer activities use a shared calendar to list dates and times for the children’s events. Be specific and be sure to add details such as exact dates and times and who is picking up. Be sure to write down everything, dentist appointments, visitation schedules, special events, etc...
• Communication. Whether it is a vacation, visitation, summer school, or a week at grandmas house, communicate. Make sure not only you and the co-parent know what’s going on but your children do as well. Involve them to the degree that allows them to have some input in how they would like to spend their summer. This does NOT mean you put them in the middle when you and your co-parent are planning. As the children do get older they will be having more to say about their summers and it is important to allow them to feel they have a say.
• Do NOT put the children in the middle. Summer should be a nice time for everyone, especially the children. Let your children BE children and do not play tug of war with them. Never make them choose between which parent they want to be with, that is an ADULT decision.
I suggest using our calendar at www.DivorceCommunications.com. Our calendar allows parents to create events at the same time allowing their children access to view them. This way everyone involved will be able to access the main calendar.
Cathy-
Copyright © 2012 Divorce Communications. All Rights Reserved.
Thursday, May 03, 2012
Trouble in the sun
Life in the sunny climes of Dubai might sound like the recipe for marital bliss but reports today suggest this might not be the case.
445 expats in Dubai ended their marriage in divorce last year - an increase of more than 28% since 2009.
Dubai has not escaped the effects of these tough economic times which can compound the challenges of relocating so far from home, family and friends and put increased stress on a marriage. Frequent visits back home by one party can also provide the opportunity for adultery which is a ground for divorce.
It is particularly important to take divorce advice early when one or both of a couple live abroad. Divorce law varies dramatically between countries and where you divorce can have a significant impact on the financial divorce settlement you receive. It may be necessary to speak to divorce solicitors in different countries to ensure you get the best outcome.
For more advice on family law visit our website, read our family law blog or follow us on Twitter @Divorce_experts
445 expats in Dubai ended their marriage in divorce last year - an increase of more than 28% since 2009.
Dubai has not escaped the effects of these tough economic times which can compound the challenges of relocating so far from home, family and friends and put increased stress on a marriage. Frequent visits back home by one party can also provide the opportunity for adultery which is a ground for divorce.
It is particularly important to take divorce advice early when one or both of a couple live abroad. Divorce law varies dramatically between countries and where you divorce can have a significant impact on the financial divorce settlement you receive. It may be necessary to speak to divorce solicitors in different countries to ensure you get the best outcome.
For more advice on family law visit our website, read our family law blog or follow us on Twitter @Divorce_experts
Tuesday, May 01, 2012
How to help your children through divorce…
Learn some great tips on helping your children through divorce including…
- Getting yourself together
- Not using your child as a weapon
- Not using your children as a way of dealing with or processing your own emotions
- Letters to write to children
- For an interview with a parenting expert, go here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)